The 3-Sphere

So far we have seen geometries in 2D and 3D, which are the dimensions we are familiar with.  But mathematician have found interesting geometries in higher dimensions and it would be great if we could visualize them.  In particular a huge collection of interesting surfaces come from the 3-sphere S3 in R4.  Though the developers of Houdini probably did not aim for creating an environment beyond 3D Euclidean space, it turns out as a surprise that Houdini is a natural tool to explore the 3-sphere.

Definition

The 3-sphere S3 is defined as a subset of unit vectors in R4
S3={(x,y,z,w)R4|x2+y2+z2+w2=1}.
Just like the unit spheres in other dimensions, the tangent vectors v=(x˙,y˙,z˙,w˙)R4 at a point p0=(x0,y0,z0,w0)S3 satisfies v,p0R4=0, that is, the tangent plane at p0 is a 3-dimensional hyperplane with normal vector being p0.  The inner product of tangent vectors (also known as the metric) on the 3-sphere inherits from the R4 inner product, which gives us the notion of measures such as length, angle, area, and volume, and therefore defines geodesics (shortest paths), polygons (with edges being geodesics) and Riemannian curvatures (deviation of sum of exterior angles from 2π per unit area of polygon oriented in a particular direction).

Stereographic Projection

By the stereographic projection one has an identification between S3 and R3{}:

S3toR3((x,y,z,w))=(x1w,y1w,z1w)
and its iverse
R3toS3(P=(x,y,z))=(2x1+|P|2,2y1+|P|2,2z1+|P|2,1+|P|21+|P|2).

Each point in R3{} represents a unique point in S3 and vice versa, hence we visualize geometries in S3 by mapping them in R3{} through the stereographic projection. The stereographic projection is particularly nice because it is conformal, hence the angles we see after projection are the same as they would look in 4D!

Another remarkable fact about S3toR3 is that it maps minimal surfaces (soap films extremizing area) in S3 to Willmore surfaces in R3 (shapes of elastic surfaces extremizing bending energy). [J.L. Weiner 1978]

Nevertheless, the length is not preserved in stereographic projections; the objects in S3 closer to (0,0,0,1) will look much larger after projection.  Put it differently, the seemingly infinitely large space R3{} is actually not that large after R3toS3.  In fact S3 is compact.  In topology R3toS3:R3S3{(0,0,0,1)} is called Alexandroff’s one-point compactification.

One-point compactification is just the abstract way of convincing oneself R3{} can be viewed as a closed and bounded set, with stereographic projection the concrete way of doing so.  This brings a nice picture that S3 is in fact the union of 2 solid tori with their boundary torus surfaces glued together. (The complement of a solid torus in R3 is another solid torus after one-point compactification.)

S3 is the set of unit quaternion

Elements in S3 are naturally viewed as quaternions with unit length.  This makes S3 a (non-abelian) group with quaternionic multiplication (multiplications of unit quaternions are unit quaternions).  This group is in fact a double cover of 3D rotation group SO(3) because each unit quaternion q represents a 3D rotation vqvq and that q and q represent the same 3D rotation.

Rotations in 4D

To explore a 2-spherical globe in 3D, you apply 3D rotation to the sphere.  To explore around a 3-sphere, you apply rotations in 4D.

4D rotations (SO(4)) have 6 degrees of freedom.  They can be represented by a pair of unit quaternions: given (q1,q2)S3×S3, the map ψq1ψq2 from HH is a 4D rotation.  The representation S3×S3SO(4) is a double cover that (q1,q2) rotation is the same as (q1,q2) rotation.  Composition of 4D rotation is implemented in S3×S3 as (q1,q2)(q3,q4)=(q1,q2)(q3,q4)=(q1q3,q2q4).

Let’s look at some special subgroups of 4D rotations.  One example is {(q1,q2)S3|q1=q2}.  It rotates 4-vectors as ψqψq.  When ψS3 and visualized via S3toR3, it becomes just the 3D rotations.

Another example is {(q1,q2)S3|q1=q2}.  In S3toR3 visualization view it behaves as a sphere inversion in the direction of ±Im(q1).

Another interesting subgroup is {(eiθ,1)|θ[0,2π]}.  The trajectory of eiθψ of a given ψ becomes a circle that wind both “along” and “around” a torus.  The trajectory of ψeiθ forming from another subgroup {(1,eiθ)} is similar but with another orientation.  Note that given any random ψ1, ψ2S3, the circles {eiθψ1|θ[0,2π]} and {eiθψ2}|θ[0,2π]} are always interlinked (if they are not the same circles).

Hopf fibration

Hopf fibration says that S3 is in fact the disjoint union of circles, and the set of these circles is a 2-sphere.  That is, there is a smooth map π:S3S2, called the Hopf map, and the preimage of each point in S2 is a circle in S3.

A concrete example of a Hopf map is ψπψiψ for ψS3.  The result is just a rotation of the unit vector i in 3D by ψS3 so the result lies in S2.  One can check that π is onto (covers the whole 2-sphere) and for each s=ψiψS2, the preimage π1(s)={eiθψ|θ[0,2π]}.  These circles are also called the Hopf fibers.

This entry was posted in Lecture. Bookmark the permalink.